First stage: Generally, evidence is required to file a case in court

First stage: Generally, evidence is required to file a case in court. One cannot file a lawsuit based merely on belief without evidence. You may know what the truth is, but without evidence, the case would be viewed as one based solely on belief; consequently, the court would dismiss it.

Second stage: Your internal privacy has been exposed to the public via mobile phones. Similarly, it will be exposed live and instantly to the mobile phones of lawyers and judges. Therefore, if a court is to hear a case based on the evidence that your internal privacy has been exposed to everyone's mobile phones, who would be the first to present that evidence? What happens if only one person comes forward while no one else does? Essentially, a significant number of people would need to present their mobile phone evidence simultaneously. So, who would coordinate them? Another issue is that those who expose your privacy to mobile phones can just as easily uninstall the application. If that app were suddenly uninstalled from everyone's phones, what evidence would remain to present in court? There is yet another problem, as you are well aware: the perpetrators can manipulate thoughts and emotions, and even launch severe attacks on specific individuals—consequently, no one would be willing to come forward and provide evidence from their mobile phones.

Third stage: Evidence exists, so what order will the court issue? It will direct the police to identify the culprit. However, unfortunately, there is no single individual who can be identified as the culprit; instead, there is a specific system involved. Consequently, the police cannot arrest a system. If the police are ultimately unable to identify the culprit in a particular case, nothing can be done; the case will simply be treated as an abandoned one. There are already many such cases.