Saturday, 7 November 2026

The public will react to your (targeted individual) privacy without any meaning

The public will react to your (targeted individual) privacy without any meaning. You should also react without any meaning. In fact, the public will have to try hard to react. But you don’t have to try hard. The public will have to react immediately when they see you. But you can react immediately or later. A brief reaction is enough. Because the public’s reaction has no meaning, so your reaction doesn’t have to have any meaning either.

Even a slight murmur is enough. You can easily send information to anyone in any corner of the world, whether local, out of town, out of state, or another country. You can speak normally. You can also scold. But if you scold, the public will be very happy. So it is best to react normally, meaninglessly, without any expectations.

Don't forget one thing. If you are severely stressed, it has no connection to the public. If anyone in the public is severely stressed, it has no connection to you. You need to learn to react in a way that doesn't interfere with severe stress.

This only applies to indirect action-reactions. It does not apply to direct action-reactions.

Most targeted individuals say that the main thing that defines them...

Most targeted individuals say that the main thing that defines them as targeted individuals is that the perpetrator (through technology) is mentally and physically harassing them. That is not true. Perpetrators (through technology) will mentally and physically harass anyone (when necessary). The fact that internal privacy has been released to the public's cell phones is a key characteristic of targeted individuals. How the perpetrators mentally and physically harass is not the characteristic of targeted individuals. Most targeted individuals confuse these two things.

Just as targeted individuals and the public are privately monitored...

Just as targeted individuals and the public are privately monitored, will perpetrators also be monitored by the perpetrators in the next layer? Of course they will be monitored. If perpetrators are monitored just as the public is monitored, will perpetrators be attacked just as the public is attacked through technology? Logically, it means that perpetrators will also be attacked. Only the range will be slightly different. Will the wives, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, parents of perpetrators be attacked? Of course. Then it means that it will work as if it were the same law for everyone.

So there is no use in blaming the perpetrators. There is no use in blaming the public who consume the internal privacy of the targeted individuals and react. Targeted individuals have no choice but to learn anew to live according to their problems. Targeted individuals should pay more attention to how to fix these problems such as earning problems, family problems, mental health problems, and physical health problems.

Perpetrators will see both targeted individuals and the public as internal and external, and will attack when necessary. Targeted individuals should understand that the public (everyone) does not have privacy like targeted individuals. Targeted individuals should also understand that perpetrators do not have privacy either.

At least 75% should be optimistic...

At least 75% should be optimistic. That is, if you are pessimistic, you can be pessimistic up to 25%. No more than that. optimism should be with the ability to manage pessimism.

At least 75% should be positive. Positive thoughts, positive meanings, positive feelings. That is, if you are negative, you can be negative up to 25%. No more than that. You should be positive with the ability to manage negativity.

If there is no problem...

75% can be emotional. 25% can be logical. Emotional approach can be with the ability to manage logical approach.

If there is a problem...

75% should be logical. Up to 25% can be emotional. Definitely logical approach should be with the ability to manage emotional approach.

This is a basic requirement.

Friday, 6 November 2026

Targeted Individual to Targeted Individual

Targeted Individual to Targeted Individual

What use are your explanations for us? You have not been able to stop the suffering caused by the perpetrators. You have not been able to stop the leakage of our privacy to the public's cell phones. You have not been able to stop the indirect harassment caused by the public. You have not been able to fix the economic problems that have befallen most of the targeted individuals. There is no use in getting married, there is no use in not getting married. You have not been able to change this. The problems are only getting worse, not less. What use are your explanations for us?

A targeted individual cannot be in a continuous friendship...

A targeted individual cannot be in a continuous friendship with another targeted individual. Targeted individuals cannot face the indirect interferences that perpetrators provide. They will fight with each other. Nothing can be done. Try to continue a friendship with anyone. It is not possible. It will not continue.

I don't understand why my understanding of what kind of problem...

I don't understand why my understanding of what kind of problem we are in (targeted individuals and the public) causes dissatisfaction and anger in many targeted individuals.

First, we need to understand exactly what kind of problem we are in. Only then can we decide what to do.

Can we go to the police station, the court, the Human Rights Commission and file a complaint? No, we can't. We don't have the evidence.

Is it possible for all the targeted individuals in India to fight together? Who can unite all the targeted individuals? How to identify the targeted individuals? How to deal with the economic problem?

So, for now, we have to find out what possibilities there are for living within our borders.

There are two things. Preventing before they happen and solving after they happen. Is there a possibility to prevent problems before they happen? Is there a possibility to solve problems after they happen?